However, CSS selectors and parts of the Javascript API use ID attributes, so that is likely why the name attribute feel out of favor, with the exception for forms. Finally, the time how long collected personal data is stored should be minimized. definition of each attribute in the reference manual indicates whether its value is case-insensitive. Changes between this version and the previous Recommendation are The named character reference ' (the apostrophe, U+0027) was introduced in XML 1.0 but does not appear in HTML. Within the XHTML namespace, user agents are expected to recognize the "class" attribute. Such a document must meet all of the following criteria: It must conform to the constraints expressed in one of the three DTDs found in DTDs and in Appendix B. However, the HTML validator at If not explicitly included, step defaults to 1 for number and range, and 1 unit type (second, week, month, day) for the date/time input types. The following characters are defined in [XML] white space characters: The XML processor normalizes different systems' line end codes into one single LINE FEED character, that is passed up to the application. Although a restricted form of SGML, XML nonetheless preserves most of SGML's power and In both cases, if omitted, the value defaults to 1. Some HTML user agents are unable to interpret boolean attributes when these appear in their full (non-minimized) form, as required by XML 1.0. Minify. Wrong! XHTML is case sensitive markup language. A summary of such elements and the elements that should not be nested in them Then again, for many sites it may be questionable whether its worth the complication of adding the tool, given the near-zero performance benefit of minifying HTML. This appendix summarizes design guidelines for authors who wish their XHTML documents to render on existing HTML user agents. I would also hesitate to recommend omitting quotes because well it doesnt offer any benefits. HTML, as originally conceived, was to be a language for the exchange of scientific and other technical documents, suitable for use by non-document specialists. User agents that access XHTML documents served as Internet media type, User agents that access XHTML documents served as Internet media types.
and not ). The W3C XHTML 1.0 spec states: XML does (as a standard) and for adapting HTML to vertical, highly specialized, markets. Women are some of the strongest warriors the world has ever known, but they can be delicate and strong simultaneously. The user agent must use the definition from CSS for processing whitespace characters [CSS2].
here is a paragraph.
here is another paragraph.
. Learn more. I dont wanna go back to HTML where Tags are sometime closed and sometimes not, sometimes uppercase sometimes not. Although XHTML is dead, many of these rules have never been questioned again. Both of these attributes are designed to be used as fragment identifiers. However, WebAttribute Minimization XHTML does not allow attribute minimization., as the W3C (MIT, INRIA, Keio), All Rights Reserved. Modularization specification). And while the use of extension elements isnt as bad as before HTML4/5 standards, it still has to be accounted for. For non-empty elements, end tags are required. Required fields are marked *. About the only thing I miss from the HTML way is attribute minimalization. Every single time. And I agree, XHTML was a bit of too much constraints but it did a lot of good to HTML according to me. One is the mental overhead of remembering things you really dont need to remember. defined to be of type ID. Perhaps some of them make your code more readable too. XML all the things. For HTML, this had a profound effect: The effect that we learned to write it the XHTML way. But the reality is they just dont matter. This includes XML whitespace handling, CDATA sections, doubling of name attribute values, the case of pre-defined value sets, and hexadecimal entity references: Peeling away from these rules, this looks a lot less like were working with XML, and more like working with HTML. The min attribute defines the minimum value that is acceptable and valid for the input containing the attribute. I just fixed the library to generate tags and it solved the problem. An alternative is to use external script and style documents. At the time of publication, the working group believed there were zero patent disclosures relevant to this specification. In a remarkably short space of time, HTML became wildly popular and rapidly outgrew its original purpose. illustrated in a diff-marked version. W3C liability, trademark, document use and software licensing rules apply. This means the author has used But while HTML documents work even when they contain severe syntax and wellformedness issues, its neither useful for the professional nor our field to use and abuse this resilience. If you set disabled="SOMETHING", your input will be disabled. The only way to do what you want is to not put the disabled attributes in your form. In Critical Defense of Frontend Development., these attributevalue pairs to be omitted, a smaller payload also leading to faster sites. An example root element might look like: There must be a DOCTYPE declaration in the document prior to the root element. In order to be consistent with the XML 1.0 Recommendation [, When a user agent processes an XHTML document as generic XML, it shall only recognize attributes of type. This process may change attributes at the
allowed by XML gives uncertain results in many existing user agents. There are more like this imho. Your email address will not be published. Lets actually do this (without the SGML part, because HTML isnt based on SGML anymore): Lets remove the esoteric things; the things that dont seem relevant. Its a light loss for an effective style tool. Note: be aware that if a document must include the character encoding declaration in a meta http-equiv statement, that document may always be interpreted by HTTP servers and/or user agents as The XHTML family is designed with general user agent interoperability in mind. I dont want to have to look out for potentially-wrong syntax. XHTML: In XHTML, names are case sensitive and it doesnt allow attribute minimization. Write a DOCTYPE declaration at the start of the XHTML document. The attribute minimization is described as an in the way of checked. Where Im 100% on board is avoiding redundancy with things like disabled="disabled". The annotated contents of this file are available in this separate section for completeness. Attribute-value pairs must be written in full. As a result, < and & will be treated as the start of markup, and Just because HTML is more permissive doesnt mean we should lower our standards to it. There are two ways of writing HTML: as SGML or as XML.
